Tuesday, July 21, 2015

List of Occupational Therapist Certifications

Potential Certifications
  • AOTA Board Certifications
    • Gerontology
    • Mental Health
    • Pediatrics
    • Physical Rehabilitation
  • AOTA Specialty Certification
    • Driving and Community Mobility
    • Environmental Modification
    • Feeding, Eating, and Swallowing
    • Low Vision
    • School Systems
  • Certified Assistive Technology Professional
  • Certified Aging-in-Place Specialist
  • Certified Diabetes Educator
  • Certified Dementia Practitioner
  • Certified Driver Rehabilitation Specialist
  • Certified Ergonomics Assessment Specialist
  • Certified Hand Therapist
  • Certified Low Vision Therapist
  • Certified Lymphedema Therapist
  • Certified Orientation and Mobility Specialist
  • Certified Stroke Rehabilitation Specialist
  • Certified Vision Rehabilitation Specialist 
  • Function Capacity Evaluation Certification
  • Irlen Screener's Certfication for Visual & Sensory Processing Disorders
  • LSVT BIG Certification
  • Neuro-Developmental Treatment Certification
  • Neuro-IFRAH Certification
  • Physical Agent Modalities Certification
  • Saebo Certified Therapist
    • Saebo’s Functional Dynamic Orthoses on patients that have had a neurological injury
  • USC/WPS Sensory Integration Certification


Assessments that Require Training or Certification

Most commonly used:
  • Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS)
  • Arnadottir OT-ADL Neurobehavioral Evaluation (A-ONE)
  • Functional Assessment Measure


In Alphabetical Order:
  • Behavioural Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome
  • Chedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessment Measure**
  • Continuous Scale Physical Functional Performance Assessment
  • Disability Rating Scale**
  • Disorders of Consciousness Scale
  • MDS-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale
  • National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale
  • Physical Activity Recall Assessment for People with Spinal Cord Injury
  • Quality of Well Being Assessment - Original
  • Sensory Integration and Praxis Test
  • Sensory Organization Test**
  • Syndey Psychosocial Reintegration Scale
  • Unified Dyskinesia Rating Scale


** = not required, but strongly recommended

Disclaimer: Just because an assessment is not listed under this section DOES NOT mean that it does not require training or certification. You, as a licensed practitioner, are responsible for understanding the qualifications of each assessment you administer.

_____


I created this source because I often have difficulty finding what certifications OTRs can get. I have yet to find a site where the information is all in one place. After some thinking, I thought that I should just go ahead and make my own reference! I will continue to update this post as I find out about more certifications and more assessments. I will be sure to make some indication that something new was added in case you find yourself checking back from time to time. If you yourself know of or have a certification OTRs are qualified for please feel free to comment below and I will add it to the list. The same goes for assessments. Eventually, I will add links to where you can access more information about both the certifications and assessments. For now, I hope this reference is helpful to you.

Monday, July 20, 2015

Switch Adapting!


In my assistive technology class we made switches! Each of us got to make our own! It was tons of fun. It was a little frustrating at first because I got too carried away with the solder, but by the end I was SUPER PROUD! ha

Here is a link similar to what we did:
 http://www.smasupport.com/making_a_switchadapted_toy.htm


Classmates working on their switch 

My switch half-way completed

My completed switch! 
Switch connected to flashlight
Video below demonstrates my switch working!



Friday, July 17, 2015

Assistive Technology Seminar Day!


Fruit, Tea, Water (later chex mix was added to the table)
Cookies, Brownie Brittle, Cupcakes, Donuts, M&Ms,
Soapilla Cheesecake, Peanut Butter Cereal Bars, and Coffee
Today, July 17th, was AT Seminar Day! It was a long day, but it was a great day! I had tons of fun! So, the event lasted from 9am-4pm. Several students from the program brought snacks for the vendors and attendees to munch on! For lunch, we were provided sandwiches from McAlister's Deli. We were broken into 6 groups with 19 students each. There were roughly 16 vendors give or take. Some were set up in the lobby of the building and others were in different classrooms or conference rooms throughout the building. In the lobby, there were also small contests that we could compete in to win a gift card prize (who could put a sock on with the sock aid the fastest, who could write their name most legibly with a writing aid, who could type a selected sentence with a typing stick the fastest, who could button two buttons of a button-up shirt with a button hook the fastest, who could adjust the leg rests to the proper height quickest and on first try, and who could adjust the breaks the fastest). I won the sock aid contest! My prize was a sonic gift card. Also, during the seminar, I learned how to pop a wheelie (though not very good) and how to recover from a wheelchair fall (i.e., how to pull yourself back upright after tipping backward in a wheelchair). Other than that, there isn't much else to say about the day. I have included tons of pics below. Enjoy! Keep in mind not every item at the seminar is pictured below. I also took a couple of videos, but since I recorded them on my phone the quality is crap. One of the cooler products that I don't have pictured is the Tobii Dynavox I-15. This product is a communication device that uses eye gaze. I got to test it out and it was really awesome. The only thing is that after a period of time it seemed to miscalibrate what I was looking at. It was unfortunate because the vendor was going to record me using the device but then it started acting up -- bummer.

Nosey Cup, T-handle Mug & High Sided Plates

Weighted Fork, Knob Turner, Angled Spoons,
Cuff with Spoon, Weighted Spoon, Built Up Spoon, Rocker Knife

Sugru (can be purchased on amazon.com)
Foam and Gel Cushion Samples
W/C adapted BraunAbility Toyota Sienna  
Adapted Chevrolet Silverado 
Bemo sitting in the chair of the adapted
Chevrolet Silverado

Crutches & Walking Sticks
Bemo in the IWalk

"Safer" Automatic Wheelchair Wheel Locks
by United Plastic Molders
saferwheelchairs.com
Whirlwind Wheelchairs
Nurmi Neo Posterior Pediatric Gait Trainer
by Ottobock
ottobockus.com
Leckey Squiggles Pediatric Stander
by Ottobock
ottobockus.com
Kimba Neo Pediatric W/C
by Ottobock
ottobockus.com
K450 MX Pediatric Power Wheelchair by Permobil
permobilus.com
F5 Corpus by Permobil
permobilus.com
Buddy Roamer Posterior Walker
Rock and Roll Cycle
rockandrollcycles.com (website down as of 07/17/15)
AM-16 AmTryke by Ambucs
ambucs.org

JT-2000 AmTryke by Ambucs
ambucs.org
Multichair Tub Slider System
by Nuprodx
Switches (demonstration in video below)

Environmental Control Units

Environmental Control Remotes
Ergonomic Computer Access 
Keyfinder Keytime Left Hand Keyboard
 Standard one-handed Qwerty keyboard
Keyfinder Dvorak Right Handed
Maltron One-handed keyboard

Thanks for stopping by!

<3 Bemo

Thursday, July 16, 2015

Mental Health FW 1 Experience: Recounts & Thoughts

Hey guys, so as of Tuesday, July 14th,  I wrapped up my MH FW 1. To give you some background the FW took place at an psychiatric facility for short-term crisis stabilization. I was in a group with 2 other classmates. The FW was a total of 7 weeks with group once a week. The first week, we got to observe the current therapists at the facility conduct a group. I was kind of disappointed because the group we were able to observe was just a physical education group. They played "HORSE" -- not much to see. I was really looking forward to observe a psychoeducational group, but that didn't happen.

Every other week we were required to write a SOAP note on one of the group members. The most common diagnoses that we saw were bipolar, major depressive disorder, schizophrenia, and schizoaffective disorder with corresponding substance abuse. In order for the clients to participate in group they had to at least be yellow status. Red status clients were only allowed to participate in group if it was held in the outdoors part of the unit. We hosted 2 physical education groups, 2 media/craft groups, and 1 psychoeducational group. One week of our group got cancelled due to a newly admitted patient unknowingly having chicken pox.

Postive Affirmation Shoe Box
Waterballon Obstacle Course
Plastic Container Staining 
Ceramic Box Painting 
Foosketball


























Piñatas 

We did a water balloon obstacle course, positive affirmations shoe boxes, ceramic box painting and plastic container staining, foosketball and knockout, and piñata making and hitting. Our best group was probably the water balloon obstacle course. The group members seemed to really enjoy it. Our least successful group was probably the piñata making and hitting. Don't get me wrong, it wasn't a bad group, but it was a little chaotic. For one, there were wayyyy to many group members for this particular session (16 group members). The room that craft activities and most groups take place is super tiny, with not a lot of room to navigate. Also, the members didn't have enough time to finish their piñatas, which I already anticipated. I had expressed my concerns to my group members prior to the session but they thought it would be fine so I was like okay. Also, the bootlegged piñata we made for them to hit was burst on the first hit. So 1/16 group members got to hit the piñata lol HOW FUN! The group with the worst turn out in terms of attendees was the foosketball and knockout games. There were only 4 people for foosketball and about 6 people for knockout. The staff decided to join in since participation was so low. Fortunately, those who decided to participate seemed to really enjoy it. I joined in during knockout and actually won the second game -- yay Bemo! ha Also, our large dice was complete crap lol -- it didn't roll effectively and it tore apart in less than 6 rolls. It was kind of embarrassing.

In my opinion, our sessions were not the most creative. I'm horrible with coming up with activities that I think others will enjoy, so I didn't contribute to coming up with the main ideas. My biggest role was making sure that whatever my group members suggested were realistic and could be completed within the 30-45 minutes or would actually last the 30-45 minutes we usually had to hold groups. Some of their ideas were pretty cool, but not realistic to last for an entire session. Some of the other groups that hosted sessions were MUCH more creative! Unfortunately, I don't have access to their pictures so I can't share.

My evaluation on how I did is Thursday, July 16th. I think I will be rated pretty average. I don't anticipate that I will be rated as exceeded expectations in really any category. I felt like I did a good job interacting and connecting with the members and my documentation was pretty good, but I don't feel like I did anything spectacular. I also didn't really ask any questions. One of my group members consistently asked the supervisor about their diagnoses after group. I'm not particular fond of labeling people so I never felt like I just NEEDED to know their diagnoses, especially not for the purpose we were there. Now, if I was actually establishing real goals for the members to meet, then yes knowing their diagnosis would be more important. I guess I just didn't feel like it was my business, since we weren't their to actually "treat." Probably a mistake on my part. I did ask one question about how to respond to when group members become visibly upset. The second group we held, a man was just sitting there. Since he came to our first group, I knew that it was not like him to be sad like that during group. I asked him if everything was okay, but that seemed to make it worse and he shook his head no and started tearing up. I didn't know if it was my place to keep at it, so I told him that I hope he feels better and backed off. The supervisor said it would have been okay to see if he was willing to step out of the activity room and talk about what was bothering him. I kept that in the back of my head for a next time, but there was no next time.

Update (07/16/15) -- So, I got my eval today and I -- am -- SHOCKED! I mentioned that I anticipated that I would be rated average. For our FW scaling that would equal a 3, which is "meets standards, performance is demonstrated 70-89% of the time when behavior is necessary." However, I was rated a 4 in all categories except for "discusses/selects/implements interventions that demonstrate knowledge of characteristics of client/population." Wow! The supervisor's comments were "[Bemo] is a highly dedicated and conscientious learner. She exercises good judgment in treatment planning and interactions. Documentation skills are outstanding and demonstrate good observation and assessment skills. She will need to work to control occasional anxiety that appears to be related to a desire for perfection." Her feedback is similar to the constructive feedback that I typically get...my feedback seems to always be related to either my lack of confidence or my anxiety. I know it's my biggest area of weakness and I'm not quite sure how to address it, but I will continue to work on it!

Anyways, that about wraps it up. All-in-all, I'm proud that the supervisor thought I did a good job. The first round of FW 1's are all done! Yay.

Assistive Technology Seminar Day is tomorrow (July 17th, 2015) so I will be taking tons of pics to share with you guys! Look for that post in the next couple of days!

<3 Bemo

Saturday, July 11, 2015

Pediatric FW 1 Experience: Recounts & Thoughts

So, woah, talk about missing in action!

To give ya'll an update, I'm completely finished with my pediatric FW 1 rotation. I finished the last week of June -- and yes, I passed! :) My mental health FW 1 rotation will be over next week.  I'm going to go ahead and sum up my experience with my peds rotation!

So, in my last blog post, I mentioned how unorganized and frustrating the rotation was. The frustration subsided as the days went on, but our role and purpose was still unclear. So to give you some background, the rotation was 2 weeks M-W -- so a total of 6 days. We were expected to be there around 7:45am on those days (unless it was "our day") and we left around 12pm (unless we needed to set up for the next day). When we got there, we would assist the leaders of the day with any last minute things they needed to set up. At 8:25am, we all gathered together for a "walk through". The leaders would tell us the behavior regulation activity for the day, the name tag activity, the script study activity, the word study activity, the sound study activity, the OT graphic station, and what the snack for the day would be. Then we went outside and waited for our "little friends" to arrive. At the end, before we headed out, we had a debriefing and discussed what went well and not so well. 

The group that I had was what they called the "higher level group." I worked with them in collaboration with one SLPS. I honestly wish that I would have had a more "lower level group." Although the kids in my group had several deficits in speech related areas, for the most part, they were developmentally appropriate in fine motor and gross motor skills. Their only deficits were in things like attention, behavior regulation, and sensory processing (two were sensory seeking and were unable to achieve the appropriate amount of vestibular and proprioceptive input). The two things that made it difficult working with this group were 1) we haven't had our pediatric class yet, we have it in the Fall and 2) it was hard finding a way to meet my "OT" goals, when the rotation had such a strong speech emphasis. 

This particular fieldwork rotation started as a "camp" put on my the SLPS. This year they tried something new by allowing OT students to assist with the "camp." However, because our role was never thoroughly established, the activities catered to speech's goals (remember when I said word, script, and sound study...yeah all speech). I guess their attempt of incorporating OT was by adding the OT graphics station. However, unless your child had fine motor deficits or sensory defensiveness, which mine didn't, it was just more for creative expression or any opportunity to work on attention and behavior related things . So, for my kids, it was hard to implement interventions to address their needs. For my counterparts that had lower level kids, they had more opportunities to work with their kids on handwriting skills or fine motor skills, which worked out great because handwriting meshed well with speech goals and fine motor skills could be worked on during OT graphics. Are you understanding? 

Anyways, so although I enjoyed interacting with my kids and everything, I don't really feel like I did much. I tried to work with them on following directions and turn taking. I also tried different transition activities between stations to try to increase attention like bear walks, stomping, big steps, etc. We also implemented a wiggle seat cushion because two of the kids were constantly rocking and fidgeting (the wedge seat worked better for them than the round one). I also took one kid aside and worked on his words for the script because I noticed he was really struggling and not getting the proper attention to be successful (not really OT related, but he ended up beasting his script by the end!). Other than that, that's about it. I didn't really feel like a valuable member of the team to be honest, but it was a unique experience. 

So in the end, I passed my fieldwork and received positive feedback from my supervisor. Even though I don't feel like I did anything special, she and the SLP clinicians that all contributed to my overall rating saw something in me that I didn't see in myself. We were also able to give feedback about the rotation and I expressed my thoughts on the form. 

Take away lesson: So, as with any experience whether bad or good, there is always something to take away from it. For this fieldwork, we had to write a daily SOAP note each day on the same kid. On the first soap note, we had to establish at least 2 goals for the kid based on our observations. It is always emphasized that your goals should be measurable, so I made my goals measurable -- I thought. However, what I realized is that you have to make sure that your measurable goals are realistically measurable. Are you actually able to measure your goals as written and will there be enough opportunities available to meet your goal as written. For example, if you say that the client will do something 4 out of 5 times within two weeks....will you actually be able to provide those 5 opportunities or will those times naturally occur? Also, are those opportunities expected to be given in one day (i.e., five opportunities each day) or over the course of two weeks (i.e., one opportunity for at least five of the days).  As another example,  if you say that a client will do something 80% of the time, will there realistically be enough opportunities for the client to meet that goal? Say that a client did something 3/4 times...There were 4 times the client could have done whatever but they only did it 3...that's pretty good right...right, but that's only 75%...goal not met.  Do you get what I'm saying? Also, with everything that goes on during a session, can you realistically keep up with the goal you have established...I didn't realize how hard one of my goals would be to track over a 2.5 hour period. A lot of things happen in 2.5 hours and my job was to help all kids, not just one, so my attention was being pulled in multiple directions the entire time. 

So my biggest lesson was to make sure I'm writing and establishing measurable, measurable goals. The more specific, the more realistic, the better. Think...if you had to miss a day of work and someone took your place, would they understand how to continue tracking your clients' goals based on what you wrote and could they effectively measure them? If the answer is yes, you are on the right track. If your answer is no, you may want to rethink how you are writing your goals. 


I used this downloadable resource to help me come up with ideas for sensory breaks and transitions between stations. 

<3 Bemo

Wednesday, May 27, 2015

FW 1 Summer Experience: Day 1/2

Alright so I'm already off to bad start with meeting my goal of posting a daily update, but so far I'm still within the weekly goal.

There really wasn't much to say about yesterday, so I didn't feel compelled to write anything. I will have to be mindful of what I say in this post because I'm not sure who all will read it. So, this week is primarily focused on "training," planning, and set up. As mentioned in a previous blog post, I am currently in a pediatrics and mental health fieldwork.

If I can be completely honest my experience with the pediatric fieldwork has not been that enjoyable. So far it seems unorganized and incomplete meaning that essential details seem to be missing. I have been confused since day 1 and that confusion has not subsided much since then either. We are told what we are supposed to do, but not exactly how we are supposed to do it and sometimes not even when. On the first day, it was emphasized what things could cause you to fail fieldwork. There were many things mentioned and much of them were mistakes that could easily be made. Therefore, when things are unclear I find that I get really frustrated in fear that I will miss something and fail fieldwork. In my younger days, I was more of a "go with the flow" person, but since I have gotten older...not so much. I'm trying to work on it, but so far, no good.

Continuing on with pediatrics, when I heard "training" I thought we were actually going to be trained on the skills necessary to successfully plan and implement activities/interventions for these summer programs. However, so far, that has not been the case and today was really our last day of training. We went over the syllabus, our general role in the summer program, and discussed TEAMSTEPPS which is an evidenced-based model designed to optimize team performance.

Today was little bit more exciting, we did much more activities and such. Since we are working interprofessionally with speech language pathology (SLP) students we did an activity where we had 5 minutes to write on a large piece of poster paper what we thought the other profession did (e.g., SLP wrote what they thought OT did, and OT wrote what they thought SLP did). Then we did a campfire activity where one student acted as the "client" and sat on a wiggle seat cushion or an exercise ball and had to follow the woman in the front's directions using pretzels, hot tamales, and marshmallows. After the activity, we had to label the SLP components (e.g., receptive language, articulation, sensory components, protesting) and OT components (e,g., balance, posture, stability, attention, problem solving, fine motor skills) of the activity. Then a lady came and talked to us about behavior regulation and some of the activities we will be doing with the students. After that, we were broken into our programs where we discussed a bit more about the specifics and then had to plan all 8 days of the program. We were split into about 4 people per day and were responsible for planning the activities and snacks for that day. The planning was a little rocky, but it went smoother than I anticipated so that was good.

Overall, today was a good day. The issues didn't come about until it was time to wrap up and it was announced that X, Y, Z was due and that shopping was going to be done Friday. However, outside of shopping, it was not clear (and it still not clear) how Friday is going to go with setting up and everything. Right now i'm just playing the waiting game and seeing if there will be a clarification email of some sort sent out. If not, I'll have to ask my classmates and see how they interpreted everything. I'm hoping that once the planning phase is over and we actually start the program everything will fall into place. **fingerscrossed**

In regards to the mental health fieldwork, it is much more organized and clear. I'm looking forward to my mental health fieldwork much more! We toured the inpatient psychiatric unit today. It's a small facility, but I look forward to sitting in on one of the group's next week!

I could say more, but I'll end this post here.

<3 Bemo

Sunday, May 24, 2015

Does the Prestige of an OT School Matter?

Hey guys,

So this blog post is in response to a video created by DobberOT and itsmyOT. The topic is about whether the prestige of an OT school matters when selecting your program. These two individuals had differing opinions about the matter and I would argue that my opinion slightly differs from both of theirs as well.

First, when questioning prestige, we must determine what we are really talking about. When we say prestige what does that really mean? Is prestige equivalent to a ranking? I would argue no. Although prestige and ranking may be correlated, a ranking does not give a complete picture of a school's prestigiousness. The rankings of OT schools that you see posted on usnews.com or graduate programs.com are based solely on peer assessment surveys meaning that people within the system are ranking the program on X-Y-Z factors (not some "big dog" at the top). We must keep in mind that there are a lot of factors that influence these rankings, some of which we are aware of, but many of which we are not. Do I think that these rankings say something about the programs? Yes, but I still think it creates an incomplete picture and many false perceptions.

My OT program is ranked somewhere in the middle (not highly ranked, not lowly ranked) according to usnews.com and is actually in the top 10 according to graduateprograms.com. Despite this inconsistency in rating, I would argue that my school is fairly prestigious. My program puts a strong emphasis on client-centered, evidenced-based practice. Therefore, a strong foundation in theory and research is paramount, however we also focus on practical applicability (which I know some "prestigious" schools often lack).

Another thing about my program is that the faculty are all "down to earth" and easily approachable, including the program director. Their doors are always open, they are very knowledge, and they do not hesitate to answer questions. As also mentioned by itsmyOT, my professors are not only professors but they are also active clinicians and researchers. Many of them present at both the state and national conference for occupational therapy each year.

Our program also has many great connections when it comes to guest speakers, off-campus observations and opportunities, and fieldwork sites. Our program is contracted with an abundance of fieldwork opportunities within the state (not just locally, but all throughout the state) and is also contracted with facilities in 20 other states. Also, because we have established such a good reputation through the performance of our fieldwork students, we are easily able to contract with new sites and keep strong relationships with the old.

Also, when talking about prestigiousness we have to consider outcomes. Outcomes include NBCOT first-time pass rate and clinician performance in real word settings. In 2013, we had a 100% first time pass rate. In 2014, we had a 97% first time pass rate (35/36) -- 100% by ACOTE's new standards.  ACOTE standards have changed and now report pass rates as any new graduate who has passed the NBCOT exam during the testing year regardless of the number of attempts. I have also personally witnessed (even before deciding to apply to this school), the level of skill that both new grads and long-time clinicians that graduated from my program possess.

I could go on and on, but i'll just give one more example. A lady in itsmyot's comments mentioned that her OT program offers a course dedicated to assistive technology which apparently less than 5 schools in the US offer (that comment has since been edited). I don't know the accuracy of that statistic, but what I can say is that my program is one that offers an assistive technology course. If you read my last blog post "Summer Semester 2015: Fieldwork, Classes, Books," I mentioned that assistive technology was one of the courses I was taking this summer.

So what is my point? My point is that you cannot get too caught up with these online rankings and that you should not solely base your decision on a "ranking." You have to do your own research and really get down to the "nitty gritty" of  what the program offers and how it can benefit you as a student and future clinician.

So what is most important? I would argue that accreditation and goodness of fit are the most important factors to consider when choosing a program. As I mentioned in my "Tips| Applying to an MOT program," you should be choosing a school that best fits your learning style, personality, and goals. If you don't, it doesn't matter how "prestigious" the school is, you will likely be unsuccessful or you won't reach your true potential as a future OT.

Well that's all I really have to say about the matter lol.

<3 Bemo